AlohaCare v. Ito
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Concurring and Dissenting Opinion by
ACOBA, J.
In my view, (1) an “interested” person, who may judicially appeal a declaratory or*354der issued by an agency under Hawai'i Revised Statutes (HRS) § 91-8 (1993),1 is one who is affected by or involved with any statute, rule, or order under that administrative agency’s jurisdiction; (2) Petitioner/ Appellant-Appellant AlohaCare (AlohaCare), as an “interested person,” was thus entitled, pursuant to HRS § 91-8, to appeal the order of the Insurance Commissioner (Commissioner) of the Department of Commerce and Consumer Affairs (DCCA) denying AlohaCare’s…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Gray v. Administrative Director of CourtHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
- Roxas v. MarcosHawaii Supreme Court · 1998
- Schefke v. Reliable Collection Agency, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2001
- Life of the Land v. LAND USE COM'N, ETC.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1981
- Lingle v. Hawai'i Government Employees Ass'n, AFSCME, Local 152Hawaii Supreme Court · 2005
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.