Legal Opinion
LaCrescent Township v. City of LaCrescent
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 26, 1994No. C3-93-2017PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SHORT, Judge.
The City of LaCrescent and William and Delores Cornforth petitioned to annex by ordinance two tracts of land located within an area governed by a joint orderly annexation agreement. Ordinances were passed and approved pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 414.038, subd. 2a (1992). The Township of LaCres-eent brought this action seeking a declaration of its rights under the joint orderly annexation agreement. The trial court found annexation by ordinance valid. On appeal, the township argues (1) a joint orderly annexation agreement cannot be modified, and (2) Minn.Stat. § 414.033, subd.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- City of Trenton v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- City of Safety Harbor v. BirchfieldCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Doe v. Minnesota State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Commissioner of Revenue v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Town of Bridgie v. County of KoochichingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re In re Annexation of Certain Real Prop. to the City of Proctor from Midway Twp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018
- City of Wyoming v. Minnesota Office of Administrative HearingsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
- McNamara v. Office of Strategic & Long Range PlanningCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Op. Atty. Gen. 379c-8c, Minnesota Attorney General Reports1998