Couturier v. American Invsco Corp.
District Court, D. Nevada
1Opinion of the Court
Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Motion to Dismiss and Denying Request for Hearing1
ANDREW P. GORDON, United States Magistrate Judge.
Defendant Koval Flamingo, LLC (“Koval”) filed a motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 64), which was joined by American Invsco *1147Corporation (“Invsco”), Condominium Rental Services, Inc. (“CRS”), Nicholas Gouletas (“Gouletas”), Meridian Private Residences CH, LLC (“Private Residences”), and Rebekah Desmet (“Desmet”). (Dkt. Nos. 65, 68, 69.) For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted in part and denied in part. In addition, Plaintiffs rogue motion…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Cooper v. PickettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Hilton Hotels Corp. v. Butch Lewis Productions, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1991
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Aliya Medcare Finance, LLC v. NickellDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2015
- Brooks v. Lovisa America, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- Price v. Apple, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2023
- Storybook Residential, LLC v. Allegion U.S. Holding III, Inc., et al.District Court, D. Nevada · 2026
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. DoeDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020