Legal Opinion

Truax v. Bliss

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1905No. Docket No. 53PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Lenawee; Chester, J. Assumpsit by Jerome Truax against Almond L. Bliss for money alleged to have been paid under a mistake. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, C. J.

This is an action brought for money claimed to have been paid under a mistake. The plaintiff claimed to have overpaid the defendant $272. The transaction came about in this manner: Mr. Truax, the plaintiff, applied to the defendant for a loan of $700. Defendant let him have $500, and indorsed his note for $200 at the bank. The loan was secured by a deed to the defendant of a small piece of land, which he was to sell, and by a bill of sale of plaintiff’s furniture in an hotel, which plaintiff rented from Dr. Baker. The land was sold for $650. The defendant claimed that at the time of the sale…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McCreery v. GreenMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Pingree v. Mutual Gas Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1895
  3. State Savings Bank v. BuhlMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Lane v. Pere Marquette Boom Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Corning v. WoodinMichigan Supreme Court · 1881

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Couper v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API