Legal Opinion

Pappas v. Hauser

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 11, 1972No. 54945PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UHLENHOPP, Justice.

The governing issue here is whether an alleged subscription to a college was, or was not, intended to be obligatory.

A number of residents of Charles City, Iowa, became enthusiastic about founding a college of considerable size. They worked with Dr. Millard G. Roberts, who had experience in such matters. They employed professional fund-raisers, and in particular one Peter J. Bruno. They caused Charles City College to be incorporated and they put on a fund drive.

Until the college was in operation and tuition was collected, the only source of funds was pledges. The original…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. WosepkaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
  2. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Claiborne-Reno Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  3. Meissner v. Simpson Timber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Phoenix Spring Beverage Co. v. Harvard Brewing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  5. Carlson v. KrantzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Fashion Fabrics of Iowa, Inc. v. Retail Investors Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1978
  2. Kroblin v. RDR Motels, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  3. Bankers Trust Co. v. WoltzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  4. Peters v. PetersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  5. Montgomery Properties Corp. v. Economy Forms Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1981

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API