Legal Opinion

Poor v. American Locomotive Co.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided November 16, 1933No. 4971PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtEvans, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above).

One of the sharply controverted and determinative issues on this appeal is that of possession.

In the instant ease it is clear that title to the goods upon which appellee claims a lien had passed to the Bradford Corporation. It is equally clear that the passing of title from vendor does not preclude the existence of a vendor’s lien. In fact there is no need for a lien, and none exists, save when title has passed. See sections 53-56, of the Uniform Sales Act (Smith-Hurd Rev. St. Ill. 1933, e. 121%, §§ 53-56).

But in order to successfully assert a lien, there…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McElwee v. Metropolitan Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1895
  2. Bowman v. AdamsIdaho Supreme Court · 1927
  3. In re JarnolDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1922
  4. Perrine v. BarnardIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Centola v. Italian Discount & Trust Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1929

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re Irish Beverage Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API