Legal Opinion
Centola v. Italian Discount & Trust Co.
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided December 21, 1929PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtNoonan, J.
At the close of the trial both parties moved for a directed verdict. The plaintiffs are copartners, doing an export business in Italy and New York city. The Union Food Products Company is also a copartnership, engaged in business in New York city in the importation of food products. The defendant is a banking corporation, incorporated under the laws of New York State. On August 29, 1925, the plaintiffs entered into a written contract in New York city with the Union Food Products Company whereby the plaintiffs agreed to sell and deliver to the Union Food Products Company a large quantity of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Maurice O'Meara Co. v. National Park BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Farmers and Mechanics' Nat. Bank v. . LoganNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- New Haven Wire Co. CasesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1888
- Lamborn v. . the Lake Shore Banking and Trust CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Lamborn v. Lake Shore Banking & Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Poor v. American Locomotive Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1933