Legal Opinion

Bourquin v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 9, 1912No. 18,252PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Labette district court.

1Opinion of the Court

*184The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The plaintiff sued the defendant for damages for failure to furnish cars ordered for the shipment of hay, and for the penalty affixed for violation of the reciprocal demurrage law. (Gen. Stat. 1909, § 7203.) A verdict was returned for the defendant, which the court set aside, and the defendant appeals from the order granting a new trial.

The motion for a new trial contained several grounds, one of which was that the verdict was contrary to the evidence. The record does not show on what ground the motion was sustained. Under the long-settled…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Darling v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  2. Udall Milling Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  3. Tucker v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  4. Star Grain & Lumber Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1911

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. City of Tulsa v. HarmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  2. United States v. MortimerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
  3. Johnston v. LanterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  4. Barker v. Kansas City, Mexico & Orient Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  5. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API