Legal Opinion

Rutland Sash & Door Co. v. Gleason

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided November 7, 1924PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

The plaintiff furnished certain lumber and other building materials for a house being constructed for the defendant under a contract to furnish the “millwork” on the house on the basis of cost of the lumber when kiln-dried, plus 10 per cent., plus milling at $1.50 per hour for man and machine, plus trucking to be charged at cost. The plaintiff furnished all the millwork for the exterior and interior finish of the building, which included practically all the material for the house with the exception of the frame, rough boarding, roofing, lathing, and plastering. It had nothing to do with the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Lytle, Campbell & Co. v. Somers, Fitler & Todd Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. Howard National Bank v. WilsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
  3. Brown v. AitkenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1916
  4. Davenport v. HubbardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1873
  5. Keyes v. Western Vt. Slate Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1861

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. LapanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1928
  2. Verchereau v. JamesonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1961
  3. Brunelle v. CoffeySupreme Court of Vermont · 1970
  4. Ryan v. BarrettSupreme Court of Vermont · 1933
  5. BATTENKILL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. v. Haig's, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API