Legal Opinion
Ryan v. Barrett
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided October 28, 1933PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGraham, J.
This is an action of tort arising out of an automobile collision at Pittsford Mills, this State, in June, 1930. xi trial by jury was begun before the Rutland city court. During the direct examination of the plaintiff, the following questions were asked and answers given: “ Q. What did you do immediately after the accident or collision? A. I got out of the ear and talked to Mr. Barrett. Q. What did you say to him? A. I asked him how he happened to run into me. Q. What did he say to that? A. He said he was sorry but he didn’t see me coming because he was dodging a car from Proctor, but to get…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McAndrews v. LeonardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1926
- Landry v. HubertSupreme Court of Vermont · 1927
- Ronan v. J. G. Turnbull Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1926
- Cady v. LangSupreme Court of Vermont · 1921
- MacDonald, B.N.F. v. OrtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1926
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Brown v. WalterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- Bliss v. Moore StoughtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1941
- State v. TrumanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1964
- Beam v. FishSupreme Court of Vermont · 1933
- Lewis v. GagneSupreme Court of Vermont · 1962
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.