State v. Tunell
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtPekelis, J.
Steven Robin Tunell appeals from a conviction on two counts of first degree statutory rape and three counts of indecent liberties. He contends that the trial court erred in imposing an exceptional sentence.
I
Tunell was charged by amended information with two counts of first degree statutory rape, RCW 9A.44.070, and three counts of indecent liberties, RCW 9A.44.100(l)(b). The amended information alleged that the offenses were committed in May 1986 on five different children.
Tunell entered an Alford plea 1 on each of the five counts. He stated that he did not believe himself to be guilty, but…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. DunawayWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. NordbyWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. FisherWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. OxborrowWashington Supreme Court · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- State v. PryorWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. BatistaWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. FarmerWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. StephensWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.