Legal Opinion
Majid v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 28, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2016-0731PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
■ Gladys Kessler, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Joseph Majid brings this lawsuit against Nikki Wallace, his former coworker at DynCorp International, Inc. (“DynCorp”), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”), and two unnamed agents of the FBI, John Doe # 1 and John Doe #2 (“the John Doe Agents”). Mr. Majid alleges that while working in Afghanistan as an interpreter for the U.S. military, Ms. Wallace falsely told his supervisors that he was a security risk and potential terrorist sympathizer. He further alleges that this triggered an FBI investigation, and…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Carpezzi v. U.S. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2023
- Emery v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- Emery v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- Poss v. KernDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
- Simon v. Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025