Legal Opinion

People v. Parham

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 14, 2007No. 2-06-0292PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Byrne

After a jury trial, defendant, Marion H. Parham, was convicted of two counts of burglary for knowingly and without authority entering two separate motor vehicles with the intent to commit a theft therein, in violation of section 19 — 1(a) of the Criminal Code of 1961 (Code) (720 ILCS 5/19—1(a) (West 2004)). The trial court sentenced defendant to concurrent terms of 5Va years’ imprisonment. On appeal, defendant contends that (1) he was not proved guilty of burglary beyond a reasonable doubt, because the evidence was insufficient to establish that he entered the motor vehicles he was charged…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bollenbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. People v. HerronIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
  3. People v. PiatkowskiIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
  4. People v. PrimIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
  5. People v. TaylorIllinois Supreme Court · 1979

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. BeauchampIllinois Supreme Court · 2011
  2. People v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014
  3. People v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014
  4. People v. BeauchampAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  5. People v. BeauchampAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API