Legal Opinion

Goodwin v. Shire

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 9, 1958No. 58-146PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEARSON, Judge.

The defendant appeals from a summary final judgment in an action by the plaintiffs to recover plaintiffs’ deposit upon a contract to purchase a residence to be built by defendant. The court had before it the contract and the correspondence between the parties. No genuine issue as to any material fact is shown to exist. Therefore, .the only question is whether the plaintiffs were entitled to recover under the law.

It affirmatively appears from the correspondence between the parties that there was considerable misunderstanding as to the representations made by the defendant at the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Moore v. BoydSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
  2. Moss v. CondictSupreme Court of Florida · 1944
  3. Calhoun v. CorbiselloSupreme Court of Florida · 1958

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Miami Nat. Bank v. First Intern. Realty Investment Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  2. Wesley Construction Co. v. LaneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  3. Lytell v. McGahey Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
  4. Dinkines v. DinkinesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API