Legal Opinion

Lytell v. McGahey Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 23, 1965No. 65-405PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TILLMAN PEARSON, Judge.

The trial judge dismissed plaintiffs’, appellants’, amended complaint upon the ground that it failed to state a cause of action. When the plaintiffs declined to further amend their amended complaint, the trial judge entered final judgment of dismissal, and the plaintiffs brought this appeal.

Plaintiffs’ original complaint sounded in tort for “false and fraudulent representations” by the defendant in the sale of an automobile to plaintiffs and claimed damages of $1500. The allegations of fraud were by way of conclusion; therefore, the original complaint was properly…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cullen v. Seaboard Air Line RailroadSupreme Court of Florida · 1912
  2. Ocala Loan Company v. SmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  3. Cox v. GroseSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
  4. Moore v. BoydSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
  5. Regan v. DavisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Vantage View, Inc. v. Bali East Development Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  2. Bond v. Koscot Interplanetary, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
  3. Manacare Corp. v. FIRST STATE INS.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  4. Padgett v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Lake WorthDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  5. Coral Ridge Golf Course, Inc. v. City of Fort LauderdaleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API