Moss v. Condict
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
This appeal was taken to review an order of the circuit judge granting a motion for a new trial after the jury had returned a verdict favoring the plaintiff.
The declaration contained four common counts, but in the course of the trial two of them were abandoned. There remained one for "work done and services rendered by the . . . plaintiff to the defendant. . . .", and another for "money payable by the . . . defendant to the . . . plaintiff, for money received by the defendant for the use of the plaintiff." To all the counts there had been filed the plea that the defendant "never was indebted…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Willis v. FowlerSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
- Cullen v. Seaboard Air Line RailroadSupreme Court of Florida · 1912
- Moore v. MandlebaumMichigan Supreme Court · 1860
- Ivey v. Southern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1937
3Cited by13 opinions
- Equilease Corporation, a New York Corporation v. John G. Hentz, Jr., and Third Party v. Lester Lando, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- In re Standard Jury Instructions—Contract & Business CasesSupreme Court of Florida · 2013
- Coast Trading Co. v. Parmac, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1978
- Central Bank and Trust Company v. General Finance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
- Okeechobee County v. NuveenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.