People v. Cargill
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and a new trial ordered.
CPL 270.35 commands in pertinent part that "[i]f at any time after the trial jury has been sworn and before the rendition of its verdict * * * the court finds, from facts unknown at the time of the selection of the jury, that a juror is grossly unqualified to serve in the case * * * the court must discharge such juror.” In People v Buford (69 NY2d 290), we distinguished between the disqualification of prospective and sworn jurors and held that the standard for excusing a sworn juror…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. BufordNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. WestNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. WestAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
3Cited by46 opinions
- People v. RodriguezNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Leslie Jameson v. Thomas Coughlin, Iii, Commissioner and New York State Department of Correctional ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- People v. KuzdzalNew York Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. CookCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- People v. BuelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.