Legal Opinion

People v. West

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 3, 1984PublishedCited by 34 opinions

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the matter remitted for a new trial for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion (92 AD2d 620, 622) of Presiding Justice A. Franklin Mahoney at the Appellate Division (see, also, People v Ventimiglia, 52 NY2d 350, 361-362). We also note our agreement with the majority’s conclusion that the codefendant, who had pleaded guilty to a lesser offense prior to testifying against the defendant at the trial, was an accomplice as a matter of law. Thus the trial court erred in refusing to charge the jury to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. VentimigliaNew York Court of Appeals · 1981

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. People v. BufordNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. RodriguezNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. People v. JeantyNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. People v. AndersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. People v. CargillNew York Court of Appeals · 1987

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API