Warner v. Crandall
Illinois Supreme Court
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Bureau county; the Hon. Edwin S. Leland, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sheldon
This was an action brought by Crandall against Warner & Edwards, to recover for work and labor. The principal question was, whether Warner & Edwards or Edwards & Wood were liable to pay for the services. t
Edwards, Crandall &.Wood, as partners, had been running a paint mill until the 1st of July, 1870, when there was an effort to bring Warner into the concern, and it was arranged that he would go into the business for three months, until the 1st of October, on trial, and if he then liked it, he would buy in permanently, and become a partner with Edwards, when Crandall would go out; but if…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Neilson v. BowlesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1951
- Herrick v. GaryIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
- Rolfe v. RichIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
- City of Chicago v. WebbAppellate Court of Illinois · 1902
- Boon v. Estate of BlissAppellate Court of Illinois · 1901
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.