Legal Opinion
San Francisco BayKeeper v. Whitman
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 17, 2002No. 01-16111PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND OPINION
HUG, Circuit Judge.
ORDER
The Opinion filed on April 15, 2002, and reported at 287 F.3d 764, is withdrawn and the opinion attached to this order shall be filed in its place. With the filing of the opinion, the panel unanimously votes to deny the petition for rehearing. Judge Tashima votes to deny the petition for rehearing en banc and Judges Hug and Cudahy so recommend.
The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge of the court has requested a vote on en banc rehearing. Fed. R.App. P. 35(b).
OPINION
San Francisco BayKeeper, an environmental…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Murray Weiner,plaintiff-Appellant v. San Diego CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Friends of the Clearwater v. DombeckCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Hayes v. WhitmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- City of Arcadia v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- San Francisco Baykeeper v. WhitmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Tummino v. Von Eschenbach Ex Rel. Food & Drug AdministrationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2006
- City of Arcadia v. U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Upper Gwynedd Towamencin Municipal Authority v. Department of Environmental ProtectionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.