Legal Opinion

San Francisco Baykeeper v. Whitman

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 17, 2002No. 01-16111PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

297 F.3d 877

SAN FRANCISCO BAYKEEPER; California Public Interest Research Group, Inc.; San Diego BayKeeper, Inc.; Environmental Defense Center, Plaintiffs-Appellants, and

Natural Resources Defense Council; Santa Monica BayKeeper, Inc.; Western States Petroleum Association; Industrial Environmental Association of San Diego; Building Industry Legal Defense Foundation; California Building Industry Association, Intervenors,

v.

Christine Todd WHITMAN, Administrator of EPA, in her official capacity; Felicia Marcus, Regional Administrator; United States Environmental Protection Agency,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Murray Weiner,plaintiff-Appellant v. San Diego CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Friends of the Clearwater v. DombeckCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. Hayes v. WhitmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Asarco Inc. v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Friends of Wild Swan v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation v. Bonneville Power AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. City of Arcadia v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  5. Hall v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API