Legal Opinion

Savaglio v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 9, 2007No. A110120, A111606PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

REARDON, J.

The parties to a statewide class action involving claims that Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., et al., 1 denied meal and rest breaks to thousands of employees filed volumes of records conditionally under seal without complying with the constitutionally mandated procedures embodied in California Rules of Court, 2 mies 2.550 and 2.551. After a local newspaper entered the proceedings with a motion to unseal, and after Wal-Mart publicly filed papers and exhibits in two writ proceedings in this court that had been conditionally sealed below, the trial court entertained Wal-Mart’s belated…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Graham v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.California Supreme Court · 2005
  2. NBC Subsidiary (KNBC-TV), Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Bickel v. City of PiedmontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  4. City of Santa Monica v. StewartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  5. Knarston v. Manhattan Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Lynch v. Cal. Coastal CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  2. People v. Investco Mgmt. & Dev. LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  3. City of San Diego v. San Diegans for Open GovernmentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. Office of Inspector General v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  5. Alvarez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API