Legal Opinion

State v. Jones

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 11, 2000No. 24306-7-IIPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorgan, J.

— The main questions in this appeal are whether Edwards v. Arizona1 applies after a defendant has been out of custody for a substantial period of time, and whether the double jeopardy clause applies to noncapital sentencing enhancement proceedings. The answer to each question is no.

On October 5, 1995, shortly after 2:00 p.m., a white man wearing a baseball cap and sunglasses robbed a bank at gunpoint. When he left the bank, he got into the passenger *92side of a yellow pickup driven by a second man. Witnesses saw that the pickup had Montana plates, but they could not describe its driver. The…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Peña v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Pena v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. RadcliffeWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. RadcliffeWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API