State v. Jones
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtMorgan, J.
— The main questions in this appeal are whether Edwards v. Arizona1 applies after a defendant has been out of custody for a substantial period of time, and whether the double jeopardy clause applies to noncapital sentencing enhancement proceedings. The answer to each question is no.
On October 5, 1995, shortly after 2:00 p.m., a white man wearing a baseball cap and sunglasses robbed a bank at gunpoint. When he left the bank, he got into the passenger *92side of a yellow pickup driven by a second man. Witnesses saw that the pickup had Montana plates, but they could not describe its driver. The…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Peña v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- Pena v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. RadcliffeWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. RadcliffeWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.