Legal Opinion
State v. Radcliffe
Washington Supreme Court
Decided October 23, 2008No. 80391-9PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
194 P.3d 250 (2008)
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
James Daniel RADCLIFFE, Petitioner.
No. 80391-9.
Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
Argued June 26, 2008.
Decided October 23, 2008.
James C. Powers, Thurston County Prosecuting Attorney Office, Olympia, WA, for Respondent.
Peter B. Tiller, The Tiller Law Firm, Centralia, WA, for Petitioner.
Kenneth Scott Kagan, Carney Badley Spellman, Nancy Lynn Talner, Attorney at Law, Seattle, WA, Amicus Curiae on behalf of American Civil Liberties Union.
J.M. JOHNSON, J.
¶ 1 When a police detective first questioned James Radcliffe about claims that he molested…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Michigan v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- State v. VanceWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. VanceWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. WrightSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- Clayton v. WilsonWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- Clayton v. WilsonWashington Supreme Court · 2010
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.