Legal Opinion
CARTER LINCOLN-MERCURY v. Emar
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided January 6, 1993PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
261 N.J. Super. 245 (1993)
618 A.2d 870
CARTER LINCOLN-MERCURY, INC., LEASING DIVISION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
EMAR GROUP, INC., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND ALL POINTS, INC., A/K/A GOLDSTAR EXPRESS AND ELLIOTT H. GOLDSTEIN, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued December 8, 1992.
Decided January 6, 1993.
Before Judges BILDER, BAIME and WALLACE.
William G. Wright argued the cause for appellant (Farr, Lyons, Burke Gambacorta & Wright, attorneys; Mr. Wright, on the brief).
David B. Katz argued the cause for respondent (Orloff, Lowenbach, Stifelman & Siegel, attorneys; Jeffrey…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Judson v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co. of WestfieldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Spring Motors Distributors, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- H. Rosenblum, Inc. v. AdlerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- Rider v. LynchSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
- Weinisch v. SawyerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Carter Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. v. Emar Group, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- President v. JenkinsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
- Black v. Borough of Atlantic HighlandsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
- Carter Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. v. Emar Group, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- President v. JenkinsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004