Legal Opinion

Carter Lincoln-Mercury, Inc. v. Emar Group, Inc.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided April 12, 1994Published

1Opinion of the Court

135 N.J. 182 (1994)

638 A.2d 1288

CARTER LINCOLN-MERCURY, INC., LEASING DIVISION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

EMAR GROUP, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND ALL POINTS, INC., A/K/A GOLDSTAR EXPRESS AND ELLIOTT H. GOLDSTEIN, DEFENDANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued October 25, 1993.

Decided April 12, 1994.

Jeffrey M. Garrod argued the cause for appellant (Orloff, Lowenbach, Stifelman & Siegel, attorneys; Mr. Garrod and David B. Katz, of counsel and on the brief).

William G. Wright argued the cause for respondent (Farr, Lyons, Burke, Gambacorta & Wright, attorneys).

The opinion of the Court was…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Hopkins v. Fox & Lazo RealtorsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  3. Goldberg v. Housing Auth. of City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
  4. Kelly v. GwinnellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  5. H. Rosenblum, Inc. v. AdlerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API