Legal Opinion

Cross v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 5, 1905No. Civ. No. 219PublishedCited by 7 opinions

PETITION for Writ of Prohibition against the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. James M. Troutt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtCooper, J.

This is an application for a writ of prohibition to be directed to the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco and to the presiding judge of department 10 thereof. The petition alleges: That James T. Cross died in January,-1905, being at the time of his death a resident of the city and county of San Francisco, and leaving a large estate, both real and personal, therein. That one Plynes was appointed administrator of the said estate, qualified, and letters of administration were duly issued to him, and that petitioner is the brother and sole heir at law of deceased. That under…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Estate of StanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Ophir Silver Mining Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Agassiz v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Lindley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Stuttmeister v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lightner Mining Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  2. In Re HatchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  3. State v. EisenhauerMontana Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Becker v. NyeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  5. Hubbard v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API