State v. Peterson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
The defendants were tried and convicted in the district court for Hennepin county, before Young, J., and a jury, on the indictment set forth in t'he opinion, and they appeal from the judgment.
1Opinion of the CourtVanderburgh, J.
The defendants were tried upon the following; indictment, viz.: “Fred Peterson and John Pierson are accused by the grand jury of the county of Hennepin, in the state of Minnesota* by this indictment, of the crime of keeping open on the Sabbath day a place where the sale of intoxicating liquors was licensed, committed, as follows: The said Fred Peterson and John Pierson did on the 24th day of July, 1887, at the city of Minneapolis, in said Hennepin county, wilfully, unlawfully, and wrongfully keep open that certain place where the sale of intoxicating liquors was then and there licensed, said…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Board of Supervisors of Schuyler County v. People ex rel. Rock Island & Alton RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1860
- Worthen v. BadgettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1877
- State ex rel. Minnesota Railway Construction Co. v. City of HastingsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
- Larrison v. Peoria, Atlanta & Decatur RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
- Mims v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1880
3Cited by28 opinions
- In re Ellis' EstateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- People v. McElroyMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Miesen v. CanfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- State ex rel. Kohlman v. WagenerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.