Main Street America v. Savalle
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
20-613, 19-3940 Main Street America v. Savalle 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 SUMMARY ORDER 4 5 RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. 6 CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS 7 PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 8 32.1 AND THIS COURT'S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER 9 IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE 10 FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION 11 "SUMMARY ORDER"). A PARTY CITING A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A 12 COPY OF…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cheney v. United States District Court for District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Sims v. BlotCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Helstoski v. MeanorSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- In Re: Grand Jury Proceedings United States of America v. John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- In Re Grand Jury Proceedings Gary Katz, Witness. Benjamin Jamil, Intervenor-Appellant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.