Legal Opinion

Main Street America v. Savalle

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 22, 2021No. 20-613, 19-3940Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

20-613, 19-3940 Main Street America v. Savalle 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 SUMMARY ORDER 4 5 RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. 6 CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS 7 PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 8 32.1 AND THIS COURT'S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER 9 IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE 10 FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION 11 "SUMMARY ORDER"). A PARTY CITING A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A 12 COPY OF…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cheney v. United States District Court for District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Sims v. BlotCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  3. Helstoski v. MeanorSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. In Re: Grand Jury Proceedings United States of America v. John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  5. In Re Grand Jury Proceedings Gary Katz, Witness. Benjamin Jamil, Intervenor-Appellant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API