Legal Opinion
District of Columbia v. Campbell
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided October 2, 1990No. 87-1330, 87-1331 and 87-1494PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FERREN, Associate Judge:
This case arises out of a payment dispute between a subcontractor and a prime contractor on the District of Columbia’s project to renovate residential housing in the Bates Street area. 1 Appellee Harry Campbell, a partner in Cammore Enterprises (“Cammore”), the subcontractor, sued Cumbari Associates, Inc. (“Cumbari”), the general contractor, and its sole stockholder and officer, Joseph E. Pignataro, for renovation work Cammore performed on ten Bates Street project houses. Campbell prevailed. Cumbari and Pignataro, as appellants, assert numerous grounds for reversing…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Peoples Drug Stores, Inc. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- JW Bateson Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Bd. of Trustees of Nat. Automatic Sprinkler Industry Pension FundSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Pitts v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Vuitch v. FurrDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Gwinn v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Riggs National Bank of Washington, D.C. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Beeton v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- JAIYEOLA v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- McWILLIAMS BALLARD v. BROADWAY MANAGEMENT COMPANY, INC.District Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Snowder v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.