Legal Opinion

Gwinn v. District of Columbia

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 27, 1981No. 79-768PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACK, Associate Judge:

Appellant Gwinn appeals from the order of the trial court which granted appellee’s motion for summary judgment and dismissed appellant’s complaint, with prejudice, for his failure to comply with the notice requirements of D.C.Code 1973, § 12-309. The issue presented is whether appellant’s minority tolled the statutory period within which he was required to give appellee notice of his claim. We hold that the statutory period was not tolled and that the trial court did not err in granting appel-lee’s motion for summary judgment.

Appellant’s complaint alleged that in June…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pitts v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Washington v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Shehyn v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Hill v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Wilson v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Jane Doe, a Minor Child, by Next Friend, Leslie G. Fein v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  2. Kenneth M. Brown, Riggie A. Lott and All Other Inmates That Have Been Subject to the Conditions in the Adjustment Unit v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  3. Day v. D.C. Department of Consumer & Regulatory AffairsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
  4. District of Columbia v. Arnold & PorterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Romer v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API