Bolden v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DOUGLAS, Judge.
These are appeals from convictions for burglary in Cause No. 47,276, and breaking and entering a motor vehicle in Cause No. 47,277. The jury assessed punishment at seven years and one year respectively.
In his appeal in Cause No. 47,276, the appellant alleges four grounds of error. First, he contends that the evidence is insufficient to show that he exercised control or- had possession of the wire [which had been stolen] during the burglary. Second, he contends that the trial court erred in refusing his motion for mistrial after testimony regarding extraneous offenses.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- White v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
- Sensabaugh v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Curlin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
3Cited by38 opinions
- Todd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- May v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Warren v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Torres v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Nowlin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.