Legal Opinion
Bee v. Local 719, United Auto Workers
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided July 18, 1990No. 89 C 3736PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ASPEN, District Judge:
Fred Bee and William Tucker claim that Local 719 of the United Auto Workers (“Union”) violated their rights under the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act, 29 U.S.C. § 411 (“LMRDA”). The Union has filed and a motion to strike certain of the plaintiffs’ factual exhibits and a motion for summary judgment. For the reasons given below, we grant both of these motions.
A. MOTION TO STRIKE
The Union moves to strike paragraphs 9, 13, and 14 of Bee’s Affidavit and Exhibits 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11 to the plaintiffs’ memorandum in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Beard v. Whitley County REMCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Friedel v. City of MadisonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Edward L. Richardson v. Chuck Penfold and Edward DyerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Tukesbrey v. Midwest Transit, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- Stroud v. SeneseDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
- Bank of America, N.A. v. Outboard Marine Corp. (In Re Outboard Marine Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2004
- Rittmeyer v. Advance Bancorp, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994
- Bernard v. Local 100, Transport Workers UnionDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.