Legal Opinion

Hopler v. Morris Hills Regional District

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided June 20, 1957PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

45 N.J. Super. 409 (1957)

133 A.2d 336

MELVIN W. HOPLER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

MORRIS HILLS REGIONAL DISTRICT, A BODY CORPORATE OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ALSO KNOWN AS BOARD OF EDUCATION, MORRIS HILLS REGIONAL HIGH SCHOOL, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued June 3, 1957.

Decided June 20, 1957.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and CONFORD.

Mr. Francis J. Beyrent argued the cause for defendant-appellant (Messrs. Schenck, Smith & King, attorneys).

Mr. Elden Mills argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent (Messrs. Mills & Mills, attorneys).

The opinion of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. Francis Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  2. NJ Highway Authority v. J. & F. HOLDING CO.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  3. Town of Union v. DurkesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1875
  4. Bauer v. 141-149 Cedar Lane Holding Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  5. Bowlsby v. SpeerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1865

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cappture Realty Corp. v. BD. OF ADJ. ELMWOOD PK.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
  2. Associated Metals, Etc., Corp. v. Dixon ChemicalNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
  3. Andreoli v. Natural Gas Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
  4. Page Motor Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  5. Sheppard v. Township of FrankfordNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API