Town of Union v. Durkes
Supreme Court of New Jersey
In case. On motion for a new trial.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Beasley, Chief Justice.
Interpreting this evidence most favorably to the plaintiff, there is found to be a not very stable foundation for an action at law.
The defendant, the town of Union, opened a street over a hill within the corporate limits ; and, at the apex of this elevation, with the purpose of accommodating the grade to the plane of the land above, was obliged to make an excavation of considerable depth. Over the top of this hill this new street was continued, and transverse streets, properly graduated, were opened into it; the consequence was…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Keys v. RomleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Butler v. BrunoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1975
- Casale v. Housing Authority, City of NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- Hopler v. Morris Hills Regional DistrictNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
- Argyelan v. HavilandIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.