Legal Opinion
Franco v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 10, 2006No. Civil Action 05-1058 (RMU)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.
Denying the Plaintiffs’ Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment 1
I. INTRODUCTION
The plaintiffs, 2 leaseholders of property in Skyland Shopping Center in the District of Columbia, challenge legislation authorizing the defendants to exercise eminent domain over their property. The court previously granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss, concluding that the plaintiffs’ claims were not ripe. Specifically, the court ruled that no taking had occurred and that the plaintiffs had not exhausted state procedures for seeking relief. The matter is before…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Myrna O'Dell Firestone v. Leonard K. FirestoneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Franco v. National Capital Revitalization Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Asociacion de Sus v. Flores-GalarzaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- 2910 Georgia Avenue LLC v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Asociación De Subscripción Conjunta Del Seguro De Responsabilidad Obligatorio v. Juan A. Flores GalarzaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- Asociación De Subscripción Conjunta Del Seguro De Responsabilidad Obligatorio v. Flores GalarzaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007