Legal Opinion
Salinas v. Kroger Texas, L.P.
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided February 12, 2016No. CIVIL ACTION H-14-3153PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion & Order
Gray H. Miller, United States District Judge
Pending before the court is defendant Kroger Texas, L.P.’s (“Kroger”) motion for summary judgment. Dkt. 14. Having considered the motion, response, reply, and applicable law, the court is of the opinion that the motion should be DENIED.
I. Background
Plaintiff Robert Salinas (“Salinas”) began working for Kroger in November of 1981. Dkt. 20 at 3. In October of 1998, Kroger hired David Castillo (“Castillo”). *423Id. at 4. In 2009, Castillo transferred to Store No. 10, where he worked in the produce department. Id. In February of…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Eugene v. International-Matex Tank Terminals LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2019