Legal Opinion

Hanson v. Luther

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 4, 1934No. 8 Div. 585PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Justice.

The bill in this case is filed by the holder of a mortgage, standing in the shoes of the mortgagees, against the mortgagors and purchasers from them of chattels covered by the mortgage, to foreclose the mortgage and to require said purchasers to account for the chattels so purchased from said mortgagors; the bill alleging that some part of the property covered by the mortgage is in the possession of the mortgagors and this upholds its equity. Comer v. Lehman, Durr & Co., 87 Ala. 362, 6 So. 264; J. E. Butler & Co. et al. v. A. G. Henry & Co., 202 Ala. 155, 79 So. 630.

This appeal…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. J. E. Butler & Co. v. A. G. Henry & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  2. Comer v. Lehman, Durr & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1888

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Morton v. National BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  2. Ex Parte MortonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  3. Leeth Nat. Bank v. ElrodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  4. Jacobs v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  5. Harbin v. O'RearSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API