Legal Opinion

Mullen v. Suchko

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 8, 1980No. 9861PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*501HOFFMAN, Judge:

Appellant contends that the lower court erred in sustaining appellee’s preliminary objections and dismissing her complaint in assumpsit and trespass. We agree and, accordingly, reverse the order of the court below and remand for further proceedings.

The facts as set forth in appellant’s complaint are as follows: Appellant and appellee began seeing each other socially in late 1977. In early 1978, appellee took appellant with him on several overnight trips to cities in the United States and Mexico. Appellee repeatedly requested that appellant quit her job in order to be available…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Marvin v. MarvinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. PAPIEVES Et Ux. v. KellySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. Schott v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  4. Hoffman v. Misericordia HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  5. Buchanan v. Brentwood Federal Savings & Loan Assoc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Hoy v. AngeloneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Kimmel v. PetersonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Commonwealth v. BalisteriSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Boland v. CatalanoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  5. Shaffer v. National Can Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API