Legal Opinion

Midimis v. . Murrell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 3, 1925PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVarser, J.

We are of the opinion that the ruling of the court below is sustained by a proper construction of the stipulation, quoted as No. 1 above. This stipulation relates to rent past due at the date of the execution of the lease, whereby the defendant agreed to pay this sum at the rate of $5 per week, in addition to the rental provided in the lease, with the provision “that upon failure to pay the said $5 per week, then the lessor, at his option, may declare this lease null and void.” This provision authorized the plaintiff to treat the lease as absolutely void when the default occurred in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Den Ex Dem. Stedman v. McIntoshSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1844
  2. Gunning v. SorgAppellate Court of Illinois · 1904
  3. Treat v. GasmireAppellate Court of Illinois · 1912

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hoover v. CrottsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Ryan v. . ReynoldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Lewis v. Lewis Nursery, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Coleman v. . Carolina Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API