Cleveland, C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. Tartt
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court of (lie United States for the Southern District of Illinois.
1Opinion of the Court
BAKER, District Judge.
This case has been before this court, when it was reversed and remanded, with instructions to grant a new trial, and to permit the declaration to be amended. Railway Co. v. Phillips’ Adm’r, 24 U. S. App. 489, 12 C. C. A. 018, 04 Fed. 823. On the return of the case a new trial was granted, and the declaration was amended by simply inserting the word “willful” in three places next before the word “negligence.” The evidence on the last trial differs in no essential particular from that on the former, except that upon the last trial evidence was introduced showing that the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- McCarty v. Steam-Propeller City of New BedfordDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1880
3Cited by13 opinions
- Nichols v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
- Sears v. Texas & N. O. Ry. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1924
- Krysiak v. Pennsylvania R.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1921
- Scharf v. Spokane & Inland Empire RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- Bennett v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1907
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.