Legal Opinion

State v. Redhouse

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided November 3, 2011No. 33,259; Docket No. 30,386PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GARCIA, Judge.

{1} The underlying issue in this case is whether Defendant Shirley Redhouse’s uncounseled 1972 misdemeanor conviction for driving while intoxicated (DWI) could be used to enhance Defendant’s current DWI conviction when she was not sentenced to any incarceration for the 1972 offense. The State asked the district court to reconsider its ruling on this issue as a legal error six days after Defendant’s judgment and sentence was filed. We recognize that “[sjentencing may violate concepts of double jeopardy if not within objectively reasonable expectations of finality.” March…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Matter of Adoption of DoeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. RodriguezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. LuceroNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. WoodruffNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. LopezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. RedhouseNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. State v. YazzieNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. State v. YazzieNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. State v. MillerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. State v. OrnelasNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API