Legal Opinion

City of Seattle v. Littell

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1909No. 7752PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Griffin, J., entered July 24, 1908, upon the verdict of a jury assessing damages in a proceeding to condemn land for street purposes.

1Opinion of the CourtCrow, J.

On January 6, 1908, the council of the city of Seattle passed Ordinance No. 17,764, to improve Mercer street, and to provide for the ascertainment and payment of just compensation to the abutting property owners for damages caused thereby. Afterwards, in this condemnation proceeding, prosecuted under the eminent domain act, the defendants O. B. Littell and wife, as owners of abutting lots, were awarded $1,600 damages by the verdict of a jury, and they have appealed from the judgment entered thereon.

The appellants own four lots fronting on the north side of Mercer street, extending through one…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Schroeder v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Fort-street Union Depot Co. v. JonesMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Conness v. Indiana, Illinois & Iowa RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  4. State v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  5. City of Seattle v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Eberle v. State ex rel. Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  2. Champlin Refining Co. v. DonnellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Murphy v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Feuerborn v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1961
  5. State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API