Legal Opinion

City of Seattle v. Williams

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1906No. 5871PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoot, J.

The respondent city instituted condemnation proceedings to acquire a strip of land belonging to appellant Williams, which parcel of land was a portion of an unplatted tract, and which would be situated between the lines produced of one of the public streets of said city; and was desired for public street purposes, so that said street could be connected with a street upon the opposite side of said property, thus making a continuous street of full width, a narrow lane or alley already connecting the two portions of the street extending in either direction from said parcel of land. A jury was…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Shoemaker v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Washburn v. Milwaukee & Lake Winnebago RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Beveridge v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. McReynolds v. Burlington & Ohio River Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Kiernan v. Chicago, Santa Fe & California Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1887

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oregon-Washington Water Service Co. v. City of HoquiamWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  2. City of Seattle v. LittellWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Murphy v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
  4. City of Tacoma v. HansenWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  5. United States v. 162.65 Acres of Land, More or LessCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API