City of Seattle v. Williams
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBoot, J.
The respondent city instituted condemnation proceedings to acquire a strip of land belonging to appellant Williams, which parcel of land was a portion of an unplatted tract, and which would be situated between the lines produced of one of the public streets of said city; and was desired for public street purposes, so that said street could be connected with a street upon the opposite side of said property, thus making a continuous street of full width, a narrow lane or alley already connecting the two portions of the street extending in either direction from said parcel of land. A jury was…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Shoemaker v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Washburn v. Milwaukee & Lake Winnebago RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
- Beveridge v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- McReynolds v. Burlington & Ohio River Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1883
- Kiernan v. Chicago, Santa Fe & California Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1887
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Oregon-Washington Water Service Co. v. City of HoquiamWashington Supreme Court · 1930
- City of Seattle v. LittellWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Murphy v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
- City of Tacoma v. HansenWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- United States v. 162.65 Acres of Land, More or LessCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.