Hammond v. Donovan
District Court, W.D. Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ELMO B. HUNTER, Senior District Judge.
This action pends on the cross motions of the parties for summary judgment. Both parties have represented to the Court that there are no factual issues to be determined and the only issues raised are legal in nature and may be resolved by summary judgment. See F.R.Civ.P., Rule 56.
Plaintiff seeks a declaratory judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201 and 2202, that the Missouri Division of Employment Security (hereinafter MDES) is a “contractor” as that term is used in the Vietnam Era Veterans Readjustment Assistance Act of 1974, as amended, 38…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Forsham v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- NAACP, Western Region v. BrennanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1973
- University of Rochester v. HartmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
3Cited by3 opinions
- William Partridge James Zagorski William Stojack v. Robert B. Reich Helen Haase U.S. Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Trinity Industries, Inc. v. HermanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- Trinity Industries, Incorporated v. HermanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999