Legal Opinion
Golden Bridge Technology, Inc. v. Apple Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided April 9, 2013No. Civ. No. 10-428-SLRPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SUE L. ROBINSON, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Golden Bridge Technology, Inc. (“GBT”) filed this action against Apple, Inc. (“Apple”), three AT & T entities,1 and Motorola Mobility LLC, alleging infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,574,267 Cl (“the '267 patent”), as reexamined, and 7,359,427 (“the '427 patent”) (collectively, “the patents-in-suit”). (D.I. I)2 GBT has asserted the same patents-in-suit against other defendants in a separate case before this court, captioned Golden Bridge Technology, Inc. v. Amazon.com Inc. (Civ. No. 11-165, D.I.l) The parties stayed…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Golden Bridge Technology, Inc. v. Apple Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Ammar v. McDonoughDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2025
- HAYES v. SILVERS, LANGSAM & WEITZMAN, P.C.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- Willis Electric Co., Ltd. v. Polygroup LimitedDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2020