Legal Opinion

HAYES v. SILVERS, LANGSAM & WEITZMAN, P.C.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 28, 2020No. 2:19-cv-00940Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA KIMBERLY HAYES, CIVIL ACTION Plaintiff, v. SILVERS, LANGSAM & WEITZMAN, NO. 19-940 P.C. AND JOHN DOES 1-5 AND 6-10, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Defendant Silvers, Langsam & Weitzman, P.C. (“the Firm” or “Defendant”) moves for summary judgment on Plaintiff Kimberly Hayes’s sexual harassment claims. For the reasons that follow, Defendant’s motion will be denied. I. BACKGROUND Hayes worked as a paralegal at the Firm for two months, beginning on January 8, 2018. Hayes asserts that, as an employee of the Firm, she “was…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Williams v. Borough of West ChesterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  5. Mandel v. M & Q Packaging Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API