HAYES v. SILVERS, LANGSAM & WEITZMAN, P.C.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA KIMBERLY HAYES, CIVIL ACTION Plaintiff, v. SILVERS, LANGSAM & WEITZMAN, NO. 19-940 P.C. AND JOHN DOES 1-5 AND 6-10, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Defendant Silvers, Langsam & Weitzman, P.C. (“the Firm” or “Defendant”) moves for summary judgment on Plaintiff Kimberly Hayes’s sexual harassment claims. For the reasons that follow, Defendant’s motion will be denied. I. BACKGROUND Hayes worked as a paralegal at the Firm for two months, beginning on January 8, 2018. Hayes asserts that, as an employee of the Firm, she “was…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Williams v. Borough of West ChesterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Mandel v. M & Q Packaging Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.