Van Pembrook v. Zero Manufacturing Co.
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtHood, J.
Defendant Zero Manufacturing Company (hereinafter defendant) appeals as of right, and plaintiffs cross-appeal, from an order by the trial court modifying a default judgment entered earlier against defendant.
Before contracting with defendant, plaintiff Joseph Van Pembrook operated a bulk milk trucking business. Plaintiff (hereinafter plaintiff in the singular will refer to Joseph Van Pembrook) became acquainted with defendant through defendant Nick Venechuk (who is not a participant in these appeals), who was looking for a representative for defendant in the area serviced by plaintiff’s milk…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Nevada v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Pacific Employers Insurance v. Industrial Accident Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Wells v. Simonds Abrasive Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Howell v. Vito's Trucking and Excavating Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1971
- Sutton v. LeibSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- UAW-GM Human Resource Center v. KSL Recreation Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1998
- Law Offices of Lawrence J Stockler, PC v. RoseMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
- Fleet Business Credit, LLC v. Krapohl Ford Lincoln Mercury Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2007
- Smit v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
- In re Bibi GuardianshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.