Legal Opinion

Van Pembrook v. Zero Manufacturing Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 7, 1985No. Docket 80114PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHood, J.

Defendant Zero Manufacturing Company (hereinafter defendant) appeals as of right, and plaintiffs cross-appeal, from an order by the trial court modifying a default judgment entered earlier against defendant.

Before contracting with defendant, plaintiff Joseph Van Pembrook operated a bulk milk trucking business. Plaintiff (hereinafter plaintiff in the singular will refer to Joseph Van Pembrook) became acquainted with defendant through defendant Nick Venechuk (who is not a participant in these appeals), who was looking for a representative for defendant in the area serviced by plaintiff’s milk…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Nevada v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Pacific Employers Insurance v. Industrial Accident Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Wells v. Simonds Abrasive Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. Howell v. Vito's Trucking and Excavating Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Sutton v. LeibSupreme Court of the United States · 1952

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. UAW-GM Human Resource Center v. KSL Recreation Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Law Offices of Lawrence J Stockler, PC v. RoseMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Fleet Business Credit, LLC v. Krapohl Ford Lincoln Mercury Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Smit v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. In re Bibi GuardianshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API