Legal Opinion
Raul Quijada Coronado v. Eric Holder, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 14, 2014No. 11-72121PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NGUYEN, Circuit Judge:
Raul Quijada Coronado petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision finding him inadmissible and denying his application for cancellation of removal. Coronado argues that the BIA erred in concluding that he had suffered two prior convictions for possession of a controlled substance prohibited under the Federal Controlled Substances Act (“CSA”), 21 U.S.C. § 802. See 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(2)(A)(i)(II). Coronado further argues that the BIA erred in failing to address his constitutional claims.
We hold that the statute under which Coronado was…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. VenturaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Baltazar Hernandez Barron Margarita Hernandez Ramirez v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Nijhawan v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Coronado v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Jose Medina-Lara v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Jesus Padilla-Martinez v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Crisanto Ragasa v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Jose Ruiz-Vidal v. Loretta E. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.