Blaker v. Hood & Kincaids
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from IAnn District Court. Attachments by Alfred Blaker and others against Hood & Kincaids, and O. E. Morse, as receiver of the firm of Hood & Kincaids. From an order discharging the attachments, made at the October term, 1893, plaintiffs bring error. The material facts appear in the opinion herein, filed June 9, 1894. 1. The act (chapter 43, Laws of 1891) is broader than the title and contains more than one subject.
Read the full summary
Error from IAnn District Court. Attachments by Alfred Blaker and others against Hood & Kincaids, and O. E. Morse, as receiver of the firm of Hood & Kincaids. From an order discharging the attachments, made at the October term, 1893, plaintiffs bring error. The material facts appear in the opinion herein, filed June 9, 1894. 1. The act (chapter 43, Laws of 1891) is broader than the title and contains more than one subject. The State v. Barrett, 27 Kas. 213; Weyand v. Stover, 35 id. 551; Comm’rs of Cherokee Co. v. The State, ex rel., 36 id. 339; Wilkinson v. Savings Banh, 52 id. 718; Cooley,…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
JohnstON, J.:
The firm of Hood & Kincaids engaged in the general banking business, at Pleasanton, in 1883, and continued in that business without state regulation until September, 1891, when, in pursuance of the banking law of 1891, the firm transmitted to the bank commissioner the verified statement and report required by that act. The commissioner, finding that the bank had complied with the provisions of law, issued a certificate to Hood & Kincaids, authorizing them to do a banking business at Pleasanton, and they continued to transact business…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People ex rel. Attorney General v. Utica InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1818
- Curtis and Others v. . LeavittNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
- State v. BarrettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
- Pape v. Capitol BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
- State v. ScougalSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. RichcreekIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
- Milner v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
- American Southern National Bank v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
- West v. Topeka Savings BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
- Hoff v. First State Bank of WatsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.